I'd say they're just unfriendly to the UN just for the hell of it. Saddam is a defiant person. [/b][/quote] Yah i guess, and for that i would say is reason enough to overthrow his government. Besides the fact that the guy has killed many of his own people and tortured many of his peole. For example they said at the olympics this year when Iraq got the the bronze medal game the players didn't have to worry aobut a loss and go home and be tortured. I guess for Bush too bad he was the one to do it.
yeah but what does that have to do with the weapons? we (i mean BUSH) did not capture saddam because of the immediate threat of the way he was treating iraqis. he was captured because BUSH believed that there were wmd's and he wanted to use them on us. there is a difference between capturing him because of something that might affect us very soon and capturing him because of something you THINK might happen very soon and changing your mind for the reason why you captured them when it turns out you are wrong. did that make sense?
But whether Saddam had the WMD's or not. Bush just used that as an excuse to go in there, wheter he thought they had them or not. I mean he just probably thought that the cahnces of them having WMD's were high so he went with it. Once again proving the intelligence of the man. He could have totally used another reason that would have made the whole situation a little more just.