Lololol. You think I can't make the difference between my opinion, and how good a record objectively is. You're right. I can't. Instead, I can make the difference between my opinion and how elaborated a record is. However, complex =/= better. This isn't a fact I can objectively see, it's just a subjective assimilation you're making. Really, you're mixing together 2 sides of philosophy/sciences: description (What are the facts?) and judgement (Are those good or bad?). Description is objective while judgement is subjective. Do you realize that your theory means, on a wider basis, that some music genres are better than others? This is pure nonsense, dude. Also, you should never have brought your trust towards "official critics" into the game. So, let's say (as you did) that those are not influenced by subjective views about a record, as opposing to us, poor fans. Let's say they're objective. Meteora got 62/100 out of 13 critics on Metacritics. MTM got 56/100 out of 15 critics. I should conclude that Meteora is objectively better than MTM right? If you don't agree, you'll contradict pretty much all you've said until now. Alright, ATS got 66 based on 10 reviews. Unfortunately, My World 2.0 by Bieber got 68 based on 8 reviews, Fame Monster by Lady Gaga got 78 based on 14 reviews. I think you got the point.