Jury recommends death for Peterson

FreeYourMind · Dec 14, 2004

wow,

Compared to the dutch law, our punachements are really low crazy, if you get like a lifetime penalty, it's only for 20 years!!

Vampire · Dec 15, 2004

Originally posted by PyRoMaNiaK@Dec 13 2004, 11:53 PM
i think there should be a law stricter law on the death penalty. instead of having a bunch of random, biased people vote on someones life, there has to be solid evidence.
Click to expand...

how is a randomly selected group of people making up a jury BIASED?

Holiday · Dec 15, 2004

Originally posted by Todd@Dec 13 2004, 09:57 PM
It was bad enough that they found Scott Peterson guilty even though there was absolutley no physical evidence to prove his guilt. Reasonable doubt means that the jury must find him not guilty, and in this gase. there was a huge shadow of doubt. To make matters worse, they just sentenced him to death. There's no DNA evidence or a confession to link him 100% to the murders. The only evidence they had was circumstansial....Scott did this, so it must mean he killed her. Bullshit. Now, the jury has chosen to put someone to death who is quite possibly innocent. The legal system has completley failed to do its job in this case, and its shit like this that makes me ashamed to be an american
Click to expand...

I TOTALLY AGREE! it is hella f**ked up that that he was recomended for death. that is insane. the ONLY reason he was recomended is because fo how emotionally chanrged this was. it should have been put to trial way farther away from where it happened to be closer to fair.

Log in or Sign up

Jury recommends death for Peterson

FreeYourMind Well-Known Member

Vampire Banned

Holiday Married and on a life-long adventure! LPA Super VIP

Share This Page

Log in or Sign up

Jury recommends death for Peterson

FreeYourMind Well-Known Member

Vampire Banned

Holiday Married and on a life-long adventure! LPA Super VIP

Share This Page

Useful Searches