sorry to say it but that was the biggest crap i have ever heared in my life ,.... you say like "no i didnt kill people it was my hand . i didnt do anything wrong" you are maybe orginally from iraq but your words doesnt seem to sound like you have even ever lived there,...i am born 1981 and i have been through Iran and Gulfwar. man you really need to read some faqs about iraq before talking about this... http://www.sciri.btinternet.co.uk/English/...dam_crimes.html "RTFS and dont forget to read the links" Dude your hate and revange feeling causes all these troubles in the world... look at palestina and israel ..... look how long are they fighting because of hate.... you will see by your self how the hate will end them up....
Yes, that hate will end up inthe usual liberators (a.k.a. U.S.A. or, commonly mention to as "Heroes for oil") interfering and making everything worse, until Bush decides to throw a nuke for fun and make everyone shut up because of their fear. No on needs a liberator, get this well in your head. Us Greeks were enslaved by Turks for 400 years. Did we ask the Europeans' help? No, we got free with our own blood, and the new nation was doing just fine until that age's top-countries (England, France, Russia) decided to "help up", whereas they were helping the Turks for 4 centuries. Plus, that's why the UN was founded after WW II, it's not meant to be ignored by Americans
Nah we 'good' Americans are simply above such things as 'democracy' and 'diplomacy' as the UN advocates.
The world would not be where it is right now, if it wasn't for America stepping in and protecting other countries to prevent war. Many uninformed people look down on America but thanks to us, the rest of the world is not like it is over in Jerusalem where there has been suicide bombings for over thirty years. If we didn't step in to help other countries, the world would have faced its armageddon a long time ago. Many places around the world are making weapons that are now more than twice as powerful as the atom bomb that was dropped on Hiroshima. Yes we had failed intelligence on the WMDs in Iraq, but if it wasn't for America taking precautions to ensure weapons dont end up in the hands of terrorists, we might have had World War 3 by now. I am aware that we gave funding to terrorists in the past, but now we are aware of the mistakes we have made, and we are sure to never make the same mistake in our nations future. Yes our economy is in the sh*thole, but consider this. We have not had a terrorist attack on our country since 9/11. We have been threatened more than 5 times, but never once came close to an attack. We have to be doing something right with our "War Against Terrorism" or otherwise, we would have had an attack by now that would dwarf 9/11 in proportion. It may have cost countless lives of soldiers, but the more I consider this War Against Terrorism, the more I start to see exactly how good of an idea it was for America and other countries around the world. If it wasn't for America, I strongly feel the world would have come to an end due to nuclear war already. And as for Saddam? He was as much of a threat to us as anyone because of his ties to terrorism. We may have not found WMDs this time around, but it was more than clear he had them only a decade earlier. Bombs in which he could've used against the united states.
I'm not in my usual extremely political mood right now so i will keep this brief. "Dude, Where's My Country" was not as good as Michael Moore's previous book "Stupid White Men".... but mind you, it is amazing. EDITOK, i just got in the political mood. to THE DEREK in the '70s or '80s (cant remeber which one) Russia asked USA and all other countries to destroy all Weapons of Mass Destruction. They, obviously, refused. I am surprised that a Nuclear war has not occured already. I also believe that 9/11 was just a one time thing, and that all the security was only for the purposes of fear. ["Fear leads to anger, anger leads to hate, hate... leads to suffering"-Yoda, STAR WARS, EPISODE 1] the security was so that Bush could follow daddy, to war in iraq. wait, i should have called it Operation Iraqi Liberation (also known as O.I.L.) also, USA ensuring that weapons of mass destruction dont get in the hands of terrorists is pretty pointless, have you ever heard of The School of Americas (SOA)???well, the SOA was renamed to something about justice and liberty, but that is beside the point. i lost the mood to continue typing, so i am done.
The world would not be where it is right now, if it wasn't for America stepping in and protecting other countries to prevent war? If America wants peace than it shouldn't go to war. Canada is the only country that are trying to achieve peace. Canada sold all of their navy to America and most of its weapons. If America wanted peace than thats what it should do. America has like the most Nukes and chemical weapons in the world so why should they tell other countries what to do? If a drunk comes to you right now and tells you that if you don't stop drinking than he'll kill your family, would you listen or would you fight? Same thing is happening right now with Iraq. Could you please define what terrorism is please? Its when a person or a group of people use violence against people and property. Isn't that what America did to Iraq and Afganistan? Just wait in like 10 years and another terrorist attack will happen because all of the young victims will grow up and revenge for what happened. Its clear that he had WMD 10 years ago because America gave it to him. Thats why Bush was so certain that he'll find them there.
Main reason that the people there are ####ed up. The children are brainwashed by their radical parents into fighting a war they have no business in. You saw the kids celebrating the attack on the Pentagon and the Trade Center. Basking the death of others. Pitiful.
Do I feel irony there . The U.S. governement killed the peace organization they started . And any chance of a "use" of the UN in the near future.
Proof from an Iraqi citizen, the Iraqis obviously are happy that saddam was taken out of power (who wouldnt) but they know that it was all for the oil. if the war was for thegood of the people, when USA bombed their power plant during an air rade, dont you think they would try to FIX it? now Iraqi citizens live through rotation blackouts, how fun. USA doesnt care about that.
I must disagree. The world would be a less tense and more peaceful place in the US hadn't bombed Iraq over nothing. Do you know how many more people than before are pissed at America? You've got your own people hating your own government. The muslim population of the world hasn't been more offended or outraged since the ravishing of two countries by the Americans in the wave after 9/11. You only bomb other countries on solid proof, not because you want to no matter whether there's proof or not. George Bush is nothing but a greedy, power driven man who has made the lives of homeland and foreign americans very unsafe. Why not go after North Korea? They possess WMD's, have actually admitted it, and do not like Americans. I don't see Bush going in there because he knows they can fight back and possibly hurt many many people. Iraq were helpless, an easy war at the price of hundreds of american soldiers lives, but no, Bush would never go after a powerful country. It looks grim, but World War 3 is coming unless you lay down your arms and agree to peace talks with everyone. <!--QuoteBegin--Derek Yes our economy is in the sh*thole, but consider this. We have not had a terrorist attack on our country since 9/11. We have been threatened more than 5 times, but never once came close to an attack. We have to be doing something right with our "War Against Terrorism" or otherwise, we would have had an attack by now that would dwarf 9/11 in proportion. It may have cost countless lives of soldiers, but the more I consider this War Against Terrorism, the more I start to see exactly how good of an idea it was for America and other countries around the world. If it wasn't for America, I strongly feel the world would have come to an end due to nuclear war already. And as for Saddam? He was as much of a threat to us as anyone because of his ties to terrorism. We may have not found WMDs this time around, but it was more than clear he had them only a decade earlier. Bombs in which he could've used against the united states.[/quote] You haven't had an attack because terrorists are smarter than you think. They threaten to get your guard up. You'll (the american government) receive so many threats that eventually you will pay less and less attention to them as time goes along. When a few presidents have come and gone and it seems like terrorism will finally go, they will more than likely strike. It was 8 years between the 93 bombing of the WTC and the 9/11 tragedy. They waited and flew (no pun intended, seriously) under your radar when you felt nothing could harm you. Then they attacked homeland america, struck fear into the minds of everyone, and accomplished their goal of terrorising. A nuclear war hasn't started yet, but I can see hatred for the US becoming the reason for our first. Think along the lines of peace to accomplish peace. I hope that doesn't look like a personal attack, just debating.
Sorry to jump on the band wagon but that's not really true. In fact, the U.S. has a great deal to do with the violence that is in Jerusalem today. We, along with Europe and a bunch of other countries at the end of WWII 'gave' Jerusalem to the Jews to share with the people already there. Funny thing is, the people already there didn't really like that plan, and there's been wars being fought over it ever since. Now, in a lot of ways we are seeing the same things occur in Iraq. I can't even count how many times I've heard of carbombs and suicide bombers attacking American soldiers in Iraq. It's a pretty clear sign they want us out, and have always wanted us out. And despite what some people here think, its not just the 'Brainwashed' populace of Iraq doing these things, its also the fathers whose wives, sons, daughters and parents we've killed off, and tons more otherwise sane people. Not to mention the fact that when the sons who's entire family has been killed grows up, he's probably going to have some things to say, and do, about the U.S. also. I don't understand how people can think the world is safe after bombing a country and pissing off more or less its entire populace. There is NO possible way to stop terrorism, just as there is no way to stop someone from breaking into your house, car, or bank account. It just depends how badly someone wants to do it, and I'd be willing to be a lot of Iraqis right now would damn well do anything to wreak havok on America. Basking in the death of others? Damn straight they are, and can you honestly say you wouldn't be basking in the deah of someone who kills your entire family?
Jerusalem = Hebrew land. If they have a problem with it, leave. Why do the Jews always have to be pushed around?
Um... well its a funny thing. You see when people build their homes and lives in an area where they like. And then a whole bunch of people are given the very land you live on, people tend to get a little testy. They seem to have a problem giving up their entire lives... can't imagine why... All sarcasm aside, I'm not saying that sending the Jews to Jerusalem was a bad thing, it had good intentions, but it sure as hell had some bad consequences.
And an Israeli would tell you he was chased from there 2000 years ago by the Arabs, and he'd be right. So wich place belongs to who? Here are the basics of the conflict. But you see, those 2 communities could live together, but they won't. They prefer to blame each other for everything
And an Israeli would tell you he was chased from there 2000 years ago by the Arabs, and he'd be right. So wich place belongs to who? Here are the basics of the conflict. But you see, those 2 communities could live together, but they won't. They prefer to blame each other for everything [/b][/quote] And America is doing nothing about it because there isn't anything to benefit from unlike Iraq where they can get the oil
Well I had nobody agree with me on this topic so I'm just going to agree to disagree on the whole topic. If you ask me though, Bush wont go into North Korea because of the fact they not only have WMDs but an army that can compare to the United States'. North Korea is one of the most technologically advanced countries on the earth, America alone wouldn't want to go in and cause war because of the fact North Korea could bomb us. I'm sure they are waiting for the right excuse to do so, and if their nuclear weapons hit us..there is no telling how severe it could be. Remember Hiroshima? Technology has leaped BOUNDARIES since then. I honestly wouldn't want to f*ck with North Korea right now, and I feel if there's anyway we're going to disarm them, its going to be through the support of many other countries INCLUDING france, because one country alone cannot take on North Korea. It's going to take a few. Let's not forget Pearl Harbor. North Korea were responsible for that too and we let the intelligence slip right under our nose, just like 9/11. Bush is not invading or going into North Korea for a reason, it's too risky at this moment with the reprocussions still stemming from Iraq. Be assured that if they even come close to bombing us or another country, the UN will have NO problem in accepting war. I know damn well that if they become a threat, the world will not sit down at let them rule the world. Perhaps America or the UN could negotiate with North Korea, but I highly doubt it as they hate America with a passion at the moment.
The best way to solve the North Korea problem is to ignore them thoroughly. They are not any threat to the US at all. Kim Jung-il is just desperate to secure his position from the outside world and his own army and people. Kim has no intention and no ability to use the unclear weapons against the US. If you won't kick a sleeping dog first, it won't bite you back. VERY SIMPLE.