People can enjoy the thought of blowing people to an oblivion and torturing people and causing people pain and stabbing and killing and gutting and all of that. But it shouldn't fucking matter unless the crime is done in real life. It's amazing how some people are just real fucks. I mean, alright, they can be suspicious, but come on. They're just thoughts. Get on her case when she commits the crime.
an australian citizen a suicide bomber?? in australia? [/b][/quote] And? Do you think suicide bombers are just limited to the Middle East?
And? Do you think suicide bombers are just limited to the Middle East? [/b][/quote] okay whatever.. but come over here and see how goddamn hard they are on terrorism.. its different over here..its just different..
Hmm...I don't know. I think that it's better to get a terrorist caught before they attempt to fly an airplane into a building or blow up something, but I also think that it's pretty much common sense that the girl is not a terrorist. So...I understand their intentions, but they're going about it the wrong way. Maybe looking too much into things. Paranoia? Stupidity?
okay whatever.. but come over here and see how goddamn hard they are on terrorism.. its different over here..its just different.. [/b][/quote] What are you talking about? I don't care how "hard" you are on terrorism, there are 'terrorists' in Australia, there are 'terrorists' in Israel, there are 'terrorists in England, and there are 'terrorists in the US. The problem is, a person can not be considered a terrorist UNTIL THEY COMMIT AN ACT OF TERROR! Preemptive action is utterly useless, because, obviously, by definition, it's impossible to speculate on who is or isn't a terrorist, because they AREN'T terrorists until they've pursued an action that defines the label. It would seem much more logical to remove the MOTIVE of terrorists, which, up until this point, has not been pursued.