Discussion in 'Serious Chat' started by $pvcxGhxztCasey, May 16, 2005.
Whether or not it was going to be put down is beside the point. That's just fucking wrong.
I would've probably cried if I had to do that.
They could just do a frog. :wth:
I digested a frog last week, and I understand the digestive system just fine now. But a dog? That's just wierd.
I just thought if I smoked 3 lbs of crack before class, it would be a really good experience.
What a moron.
What a sick fuck
Just is just wrong, very wrong.
dissected dog? thats just fucking wrong man way to wrong
dude, a dog is a LITTLE much
thats just fucking sick. whether the dog was going to be put down or not, it's not very nice.
poor wee dog! :'(
That's sick. I hate him :angry:
Surely thats got to come under animal cruelty!! Its shocking!
That's hilarious!! stoopid Americans
I would have sooooo slapped that teacher if I were there.
That was stupid. How could he do that. Is he a human being or what? That is sick man. :angry:
PETA's on it be sure of that!
That's so cruel, I don't know what I would have done if I were there. Poor dog.
What is wrong with dissecting a dog (besides the fact it was alive.)?
Jumping on the opposite here...
It's just a dog.
Dogs are animals.
Humans eat animals.(Most, anyway)
If it were a cow or frog or something, there wouldn't be a news article about it.
I honestly don't see the problem with it. However, if they were going to use a dog that was alive I would agree with the practice more if it were done on an older dog that were on the verge of being put down anyway from a pound or something. In that case, I don't mind. Besides the smell it'd be pretty cool for biology students.
If the dog were dead, I don't think it would have made such a fuss.
alive = dog, animale curalty
dead = dinner, I MEAN, not such a big deal.
both = OMFG WTF!!
the dog was alive, it doesnt really matter to me,personally, but in generaly, why not a old, about to die, dog??
Separate names with a comma.