http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G5RQrxkGgCM&eurl What is this about? This is about Internet freedom. "Network Neutrality" -- the First Amendment of the Internet -- ensures that the public can view the smallest blog just as easily as the largest corporate Web site by preventing Internet companies like AT&T from rigging the playing field for only the highest-paying sites. But Internet providers like AT&T, Verizon and Comcast are spending millions of dollars lobbying Congress to gut Net Neutrality. If Congress doesn't take action now to implement meaningful network neutrality provisions, the future of the Internet is at risk. What is network neutrality? Network Neutrality — or "Net Neutrality" for short — is the guiding principle that preserves the free and open Internet. Net Neutrality ensures that all users can access the content or run the applications and devices of their choice. With Net Neutrality, the network's only job is to move data — not choose which data to privilege with higher quality service. Net Neutrality is the reason why the Internet has driven economic innovation, democratic participation, and free speech online. It's why the Internet has become an unrivaled environment for open communications, civic involvement and free speech. Who wants to get rid of Net Neutrality? The nation's largest telephone and cable companies — including AT&T, Verizon, Comcast and Time Warner — want to be Internet gatekeepers, deciding which Web sites go fast or slow and which won't load at all. They want to tax content providers to guarantee speedy delivery of their data. They want to discriminate in favor of their own search engines, Internet phone services, and streaming video — while slowing down or blocking their competitors. These companies have a new vision for the Internet. Instead of an even playing field, they want to reserve express lanes for their own content and services — or those from big corporations that can afford the steep tolls — and leave the rest of us on a winding dirt road. What's at stake? Decisions being made now will shape the future of the Internet for a generation. Before long, all media — TV, phone and the Web — will come to your home via the same broadband connection. The dispute over Net Neutrality is about who'll control access to new and emerging technologies. On the Internet, consumers are in ultimate control — deciding between content, applications and services available anywhere, no matter who owns the network. There's no middleman. But without Net Neutrality, the Internet will look more like cable TV. Network owners will decide which channels, content and applications are available; consumers will have to choose from their menu. The Internet has always been driven by innovation. Web sites and services succeeded or failed on their own merit. Without Net Neutrality, decisions now made collectively by millions of users will be made in corporate boardrooms. The choice we face now is whether we can choose the content and services we want, or whether the broadband barons will choose for us. What's happening in Congress? The telephone and cable companies are filling up congressional campaign coffers and hiring high-priced lobbyists. They've set up "Astroturf" groups like "Hands Off the Internet" to confuse the issue and give the appearance of grassroots support. Congress is now considering a major overhaul of the Telecommunications Act. The primary bill in the House is called the "Communications Opportunity, Promotion and Enhancement Act of 2006" and is sponsored by Commerce Committee Chairman Joe Barton (R-Texas), Rep. Fred Upton (R-Mich.), Rep. Charles Pickering (R-Miss.) and Rep. Bobby Rush (D-Ill.). The current version of the COPE Act (HR 5252) includes watered-down Net Neutrality provisions that are essentially meaningless. An amendment offered by Rep. Ed Markey (D-Mass.), which would have instituted real Net Neutrality requirements, was defeated in committee after intense industry lobbying against it. The COPE Act is expected to be voted on by the full House in the second week of May. Congressman Markey is preparing to introduce his amendment on the floor so that every member is on the record. No member of Congress can in good conscience vote against Internet freedom and with the telecom cartel. The Senate is moving more deliberately on the issue. Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) has introduced the Internet Nondiscrimination Act of 2006, which would ensure Net Neutrality. And Sens. Olympia Snowe (R-Maine) and Byron Dorgan (R-N.D.) are expected to introduce a bipartisan amendment supporting Net Neutrality when the Senate takes up its own rewrite of the Telecommunications Act later this year. -------------- Scary shit going down in Congress.
This is sick. The internet was one of the last free mediums we had for communication. You can't even go to a fast food place and not have a particular ketchup or soda choice that was bought and paid for to be there. Now, these sickeningly ritch companies are trying to squash out every little guy. Not being able to use Google?! The horror!
Hah, and to think that I work for one of the companies mentioned. Controlling the internet in the name of money/power/greed/whatever is just plain wrong.
Can anyone say '1984'? Ever since i read that book, i've seen similarities with that plus modern life. It seems this world is verging more towards this completely controlled environment, where no-one can see what they want, or hear what they want, or, god forbid, think what they want. This is just another step in that direction as far as i see it. Yes, that may be a bit extreme, but like i said, it is just a step.
It doesn't have much of a chance. If this does go through, internet usage will go down majorly, like a HUUGE noticable drop. We won't let them do this. Also, note one of the youtube commentors: "Even if it is passed by Congress, the Supreme Court will strike it down. The court has a history of ruling lesser laws infringing upon the internet (see: Communications Decency Act of 1996) unconstitutional, and they rarely go against their own precedents." If Congress does pass it, Supreme Court will most likely strike it down. ...what effect does this have on Canada? oO
... i've always wanted to read "1984", but i never found it. anywhere. and i can see what you mean ...
thats just sickening, those selfish bithass companies as though they dont have enough money as it is...
The Internet is the Internet; it's the same in all places. That's why this won't pass, because the United States does not control, nor does it own, the Internet. But like you said: Even if this does go through, no one's going to use the Internet anymore. I'd guess usage would drop exponentially. The world would probably go into recession or something weird. We'd have to live on the Moon.
That's ridiculous. But then again, it's not far-fetched for America to decide to make a decision which would affect our world as a whole (for worse).
i thought in the united states you had the pursuit of hapiness? or all those other rights i mean..who cares what sites people LIKE to go to and why take that away from em?
If no one noticed, Google has spoken. http://www.google.com/help/netneutrality.html I hope something is done about this, because it's complete and utter bullshit.