On this... "fansite review" comes off as a bit dickish, but it does push a bit into "thought process" style of explaining songs than your average review. Great for people who are already fans or are interested, however reading it, I didn't really get a feel like what they did right or wrong. I have a great idea on what story the lyrics are telling, but what songs were better than others? I remember in shout-box, you straight up say you didn't mention one song due to being pretty mediocre. That, unless the article has been updated since then, never mentions as much. It would have been great to see what experimentation soared and which ones tanked. That never really comes up in the write-up. And while "fansite review" is a really backhanded way to explain it... a mediocre song did "just happened" to not get mentioned in what seemed to be a very impressed review. Had I not just happened to be in the shoutbox when you said that, I'd have never known those were your sentiments on that particular song. You detail most of the songs very well. You don't really touch one which ones are significantly better than others. Reading it, it sounds like I'm in for a mindblowing listening experience where I can be expected to be amazed at every turn. Listening to well over half of the album already, I can already expect that not to be the case. I think that was more what he was getting at.