Not when the war has no justifiable reasoning for it to have happened. There's a difference between being steadfast and arrogant, and Bush is being the latter. EXACTLY. It is Vietnam! The only problem is that it took them 8 years to pull out of that war. Can the U.S. really wait until 2011 for troop pull-out to happen? Can they really wait until 58,000 soldiers die? I don't know how the American public would allow that.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070112/ap_on_re_eu/iraq_shrinking_coalition Guess a few other countries don't agree with you, Amanda.
Plus, all the countries that are sending more troops are doing that just not to piss off US and A. Exepct for GB ofcourse, they won't have an oppinion as long as Blair's there.
Maybe next time the US wont come to a country's rescue while it is practicing ethnic cleansing. The US still has troops in your country but that's ok right?
Really? All those tax breaks we have gotten didn't accomplish anything I guess. Just a few million new jobs and home ownership at all time highs. Yep, sure is shitty here.
I didn't quite understand what you wanted to say... NATO bombed us in 1999 and they said it was because we practised ethnical cleansing during that decade. The only time our troops really performed ethnical cleansing in Kosovo was during the 3 months of attacks. And yes, NATO and KFOR still have troops in Kosovo, but I don't know if I should consider it a part of my country anymore. It's just a matter of day now that it will become independant. Sorry for the little offtopic, I know this has nothing to do with Bush or Iraq.