I think he invented emo to tell you the truth I was one of the biggest Limp fans...ever! But as soon as Fred Durst tried to be Mr. Egotistical, the band started sucking! Trust me, when your own client (Wes from Puddle of Mudd) calls you pathetic...you got problems!
I think he invented emo to tell you the truth I was one of the biggest Limp fans...ever! But as soon as Fred Durst tried to be Mr. Egotistical, the band started sucking! Trust me, when your own client (Wes from Puddle of Mudd) calls you pathetic...you got problems! [/b][/quote] He called him pathetic because Fred got his assistent to ring him up and say good work on the new CD (life on display) and he didn't do it himself. Or atleast it's what I've heard.
He called him pathetic because he got his assistent to ring him up and say good work on the new CD (life on display) and he didn't do it himself. Or atleast it's what I've heard. [/b][/quote] I know, that's what I'm referencing here! I'm surprised Fred didnt fire them But then again, they're bringing in the money for him! Plus did they have to put his face on the cover of LID? It's like when Fred ruined the live version of "Outside"
I've never liked Limp Bizkit. I honestly don't care whether Fred Durst is a poser or not, because it's not gonna make a difference to me. Besides, what's a poser anyway? I've never been too clear on that topic. I'm probably just a poser myself and don't know it.
I'm not a Limp Bizkit fan (actually, I really can't even stand them, but whatever floats your boat, as the saying goes...), but the fact that you made this topic just to make fun of Fred Durst shows how interested you actually are in him. If you don't like him, why bother giving him publicity or try to sound "cool" by bashing him? If you don't like him, he shouldn't even be worth talking about. Just a thought.
As far as I'm concerned, you can make a thread about anything that doesn't break a rule for discussion, whether you like the person the topic is about or not. Forums are for discussion, not just making topics to be a kiss-ass for the thread subject.
True, but I was just stating my opinion on the matter -- if you don't like a band, show that they're not worth your time by not even bothering with them. You're only giving them more publicity than they already have (not that anyone's a massive, multi-national news relay or anything, but word of mouth is still word of mouth; no news is bad news, bad news is still news).
Oh, I'm very interested in Fred Durst. I think it's amazing how he started out as one of the figureheads for MTV in the late 90s, and basically held the nu-metal mini-era in the palms of his hands for awhile, then just fell off the face of the planet. When the Chococlate Starfish was released, his group started to go down-hill. Fanboys and the like can say whatever, but if you compare $3 Bill or Significant Other to Chocolate Starfish, it's complete and utter shit. Wes Borland left the band, and then I just totally lost all intrest. Then came Results May Vary. Why people shit on this album, I'll never understand. Maybe because I wasn't expecting anything awesome, I was completely blown away. The Fred Durst of the old is gone, he doesn't talk about cars and nookie and rollin' and shit. He shows a side that he hasn't really showed before, that being the emotional one. It's a tad angsty sometimes, yeah. But oh well. Just as soon as I'm feeling alittle better about Limpbizkit, Eat You Alive is dropped as a single, his little feud with Britney Spears happens (and he acts like a complete moron on The Howard Stern Show, sounding like a bragging jock type). My problem with Fred Durst is that he complains way to much now. If he wasn't a poser, then why even take the time to write this on his website? Sure, it might get on his nerves, but as long as he knows he's not, then I figure he has nothing to prove. But I guess Mr. Durst feels he does have something to prove, that being he's not a poser. I think he is one. No doubt he is anger, but some stuff... I just can't take it. I said I liked the emotional stuff, the more serious type songs, but... I have a really hard time believing he feels that way. I think he wrote that shit to save his ass and keep people on the LB Bandwagon. No doubt if they would have kept writing stinkers such as Rollin' and Nookie, they'd be popular, but they'd lose some fans I'm sure. All in all, Fred Durst is a poser, in my opinion, because I don't believe he feels what he says he does in some songs. He poses on the tracks. Therefore, he is a poser. Want to rip this apart? Okay. Have fun.
Oh, I'm very interested in Fred Durst. I think it's amazing how he started out as one of the figureheads for MTV in the late 90s, and basically held the nu-metal mini-era in the palms of his hands for awhile, then just fell off the face of the planet. When the Chococlate Starfish was released, his group started to go down-hill. Fanboys and the like can say whatever, but if you compare $3 Bill or Significant Other to Chocolate Starfish, it's complete and utter shit. Wes Borland left the band, and then I just totally lost all intrest. Then came Results May Vary. Why people shit on this album, I'll never understand. Maybe because I wasn't expecting anything awesome, I was completely blown away. The Fred Durst of the old is gone, he doesn't talk about cars and nookie and rollin' and shit. He shows a side that he hasn't really showed before, that being the emotional one. It's a tad angsty sometimes, yeah. But oh well. Just as soon as I'm feeling alittle better about Limpbizkit, Eat You Alive is dropped as a single, his little feud with Britney Spears happens (and he acts like a complete moron on The Howard Stern Show, sounding like a bragging jock type). My problem with Fred Durst is that he complains way to much now. If he wasn't a poser, then why even take the time to write this on his website? Sure, it might get on his nerves, but as long as he knows he's not, then I figure he has nothing to prove. But I guess Mr. Durst feels he does have something to prove, that being he's not a poser. I think he is one. No doubt he is anger, but some stuff... I just can't take it. I said I liked the emotional stuff, the more serious type songs, but... I have a really hard time believing he feels that way. I think he wrote that shit to save his ass and keep people on the LB Bandwagon. No doubt if they would have kept writing stinkers such as Rollin' and Nookie, they'd be popular, but they'd lose some fans I'm sure. All in all, Fred Durst is a poser, in my opinion, because I don't believe he feels what he says he does in some songs. He poses on the tracks. Therefore, he is a poser. Want to rip this apart? Okay. Have fun. [/b][/quote] A-fucking-men dude!
Oh, I'm very interested in Fred Durst. I think it's amazing how he started out as one of the figureheads for MTV in the late 90s, and basically held the nu-metal mini-era in the palms of his hands for awhile, then just fell off the face of the planet. When the Chococlate Starfish was released, his group started to go down-hill. Fanboys and the like can say whatever, but if you compare $3 Bill or Significant Other to Chocolate Starfish, it's complete and utter shit. Wes Borland left the band, and then I just totally lost all intrest. Then came Results May Vary. Why people shit on this album, I'll never understand. Maybe because I wasn't expecting anything awesome, I was completely blown away. The Fred Durst of the old is gone, he doesn't talk about cars and nookie and rollin' and shit. He shows a side that he hasn't really showed before, that being the emotional one. It's a tad angsty sometimes, yeah. But oh well. Just as soon as I'm feeling alittle better about Limpbizkit, Eat You Alive is dropped as a single, his little feud with Britney Spears happens (and he acts like a complete moron on The Howard Stern Show, sounding like a bragging jock type). My problem with Fred Durst is that he complains way to much now. If he wasn't a poser, then why even take the time to write this on his website? Sure, it might get on his nerves, but as long as he knows he's not, then I figure he has nothing to prove. But I guess Mr. Durst feels he does have something to prove, that being he's not a poser. I think he is one. No doubt he is anger, but some stuff... I just can't take it. I said I liked the emotional stuff, the more serious type songs, but... I have a really hard time believing he feels that way. I think he wrote that shit to save his ass and keep people on the LB Bandwagon. No doubt if they would have kept writing stinkers such as Rollin' and Nookie, they'd be popular, but they'd lose some fans I'm sure. All in all, Fred Durst is a poser, in my opinion, because I don't believe he feels what he says he does in some songs. He poses on the tracks. Therefore, he is a poser. Want to rip this apart? Okay. Have fun. [/b][/quote] WOW...radioactive
Oh, I'm very interested in Fred Durst. I think it's amazing how he started out as one of the figureheads for MTV in the late 90s, and basically held the nu-metal mini-era in the palms of his hands for awhile, then just fell off the face of the planet. When the Chococlate Starfish was released, his group started to go down-hill. Fanboys and the like can say whatever, but if you compare $3 Bill or Significant Other to Chocolate Starfish, it's complete and utter shit. Wes Borland left the band, and then I just totally lost all intrest. Then came Results May Vary. Why people shit on this album, I'll never understand. Maybe because I wasn't expecting anything awesome, I was completely blown away. The Fred Durst of the old is gone, he doesn't talk about cars and nookie and rollin' and shit. He shows a side that he hasn't really showed before, that being the emotional one. It's a tad angsty sometimes, yeah. But oh well. Just as soon as I'm feeling alittle better about Limpbizkit, Eat You Alive is dropped as a single, his little feud with Britney Spears happens (and he acts like a complete moron on The Howard Stern Show, sounding like a bragging jock type). My problem with Fred Durst is that he complains way to much now. If he wasn't a poser, then why even take the time to write this on his website? Sure, it might get on his nerves, but as long as he knows he's not, then I figure he has nothing to prove. But I guess Mr. Durst feels he does have something to prove, that being he's not a poser. I think he is one. No doubt he is anger, but some stuff... I just can't take it. I said I liked the emotional stuff, the more serious type songs, but... I have a really hard time believing he feels that way. I think he wrote that shit to save his ass and keep people on the LB Bandwagon. No doubt if they would have kept writing stinkers such as Rollin' and Nookie, they'd be popular, but they'd lose some fans I'm sure. All in all, Fred Durst is a poser, in my opinion, because I don't believe he feels what he says he does in some songs. He poses on the tracks. Therefore, he is a poser. Want to rip this apart? Okay. Have fun. [/b][/quote] Well Said And just to clear things up about Fred becoming mature and stuff,he takes anger management so maybe thats why. Chocolate Starfish was defenatly Limp Bizkit's strongest album,it's not that I don't like Results May Vary its just that they've broken away from their style and the need to get it back,maybe their new album will shock us all and will get another No.1 Single
I agree Wes is god. But if Fred were to be without him he may not be as big but he would and will always get himself into the spotlight.
I think that RMV just disproved your theory [/b][/quote] The fact that many fans hate RMV just proved his theory, I think.