REDWOOD CITY, Calif. (Nov. 12) - Scott Peterson was convicted of murdering his pregnant wife and dumping her body in San Francisco Bay in what prosecutors in the made-for-cable-TV case portrayed as a cold-blooded attempt to escape marriage and fatherhood for the bachelor life. Peterson, 32, could get the death penalty. The former fertilizer salesman was convicted of one count of first-degree murder for killing his wife, Laci, and one count of second-degree murder in the death of the son she was carrying. Peterson stared straight ahead as the verdict was read, then looked at each of the jurors as they were polled to confirm their decisions. The jurors looked serious and unsmiling, and none appeared to look back at Peterson. Outside court, cheers broke out among the hundreds of onlookers who gathered to hear word of the verdict. The verdict came after a five-month trial that was an endless source of fascination to the tabloids, People magazine and the cable networks with its story of an attractive, radiant young couple awaiting the birth of their first child, a cheating husband, and a slaying for which prosecutors had no eyewitnesses, no weapon, not even a cause of death. The verdict followed a tumultuous seven days of deliberations in which two jurors were removed for unspecified reasons and the judge twice told the panel to start over. The jury of six men and six women were told to return Nov. 22 to begin hearing testimony on whether Peterson should die by lethal injection or get life in prison without parole. Laci Peterson, a 27-year-old substitute teacher, was eight months pregnant when she vanished around Christmas Eve 2002. Four months later, her headless body and the remains of her fetus were discovered along the shoreline about 90 miles from the couple's Modesto home - not far from where her husband claims he was fishing alone the day of her disappearance. Peterson was soon arrested in the San Diego area, more than 400 miles from home, carrying nearly $15,000, his hair and goatee bleached blond. Police never were able to establish exactly when, how or where Laci died. At trial, prosecutors presented 174 witnesses and hundreds of pieces of evidence, from wiretapped phone calls to videotaped police interrogations, depicting Peterson as a liar and a philanderer who was sweet-talking his girlfriend, massage therapist Amber Frey, at the same time he was trying to show the world he was pining for his missing wife. Prosecutor Rick Distaso told the jury that Peterson could not stand the thought of being trapped in a ''dull, boring, married life with kids,'' and either strangled or smothered his wife and dumped her weighted-down body overboard from his fishing boat. ''He wants to live the rich, successful, freewheeling bachelor life. He can't do that when he's paying child support, alimony and everything else,'' Distaso said. ''He didn't want to be tied to this kid the rest of his life. He didn't want to be tied to Laci for the rest of his life. So he killed her.'' The jury heard how Peterson had bought a two-day ocean-fishing license days before Laci disappeared, yet claimed his fishing trip was a last-minute substitution for golf because of blustery weather. Prosecutors also offered evidence suggesting he used a bag of cement mix to make concrete anchors to sink his wife's body into the bay. Peterson never took the stand. His lawyers argued that he was the victim of a frame-up. They suggested that someone else - perhaps homeless people, sex offenders or suspicious-looking characters spotted in the neighborhood - abducted Laci while she walked the dog, then killed her and dumped the body in the water after learning of Peterson's fishing-trip alibi. Peterson's lawyers also offered evidence that the fetus may have died days or weeks after Laci's disappearance, when Scott was being watched closely by the police and the media. And they explained his lies and inconsistent statements about his affair and his activities around the time of Laci's disappearance as the mutterings of a man in the midst of a breakdown over his missing wife. Defense attorney Mark Geragos acknowledged the jurors probably hated Peterson, and pleaded with them not to convict him simply because the prosecution had made him look like a ''jerk and a liar.'' Geragos also noted the lingering questions about how Laci died. ''Maybe the logical explanation for the fact that we have no evidence of her struggling in that house, dying in that house is because it didn't happen in that house,'' he said. In addition, Geragos said police found that someone had used a computer in the Petersons' home on the morning Laci vanished - after authorities contend Laci was already dead - to search Web sites for a scarf and a sunflower-motif umbrella stand. He suggested the user was Laci. The story proved irresistible to the cable networks, which almost every night brought in experts to pick apart the two sides' legal strategies and expound on some of the soap opera aspects of the case, which included hours of secretly taped calls in which Peterson spun out elaborate tales to Frey. Frey herself testified, saying that Peterson told her during their affair that he had ''lost his wife.'' But she said that in all their recorded conversations, he repeatedly professed his love for his wife and never said anything to incriminate himself in her slaying. In January, the case was moved from Modesto to Redwood City after defense attorneys argued Peterson had been demonized in his hometown to the point that he couldn't get a fair trial. The verdict came after about eight hours of deliberation by the final 12 jurors.
Yah I just caught the news on CNN too. Good he deserved every bit of what he got. Nice to see justice being done unlike the justice system here in Canada.
Scott Peterson probably did it, but the keyword there is probably. IIRC, there was not a single piece of tangible, physical evidence against him, it was all circumstansial, which leaves a big if. There was more evidence to convict OJ than to convict him and the prosecution didn't prove 100% beyond a shadow of a doubt that he's guilty so the jury should not have convicted him. As I said, he probably did it and deserves to rot in a cell if he really did, however, his trial was anything but fair and I hope he gets a new one to either prove beyond any doubt that he is guilty or he didn't do it.
I'll be pissed if he gets Death Row. And then actually gets executed. Why execute someone who murdered his wife & unborn child before someone like Charles Manson? That's absurd. EDIT: I think I just answered my own question.
I agree with Todd. If there's even the slightest chance that he might be innocent, I don't think he should have been found guilty. And I think that IF he was guilty, he should receive life in prison, not the death penalty. Random thought: who here has read the play "Twelve Angry Men"? I wonder what that jury panel was like...
i totally agree w/ what you said. and i dont think that the mother and an unborn child should be counted as a double murder. the cild istn really alive yet. it cant survive on its own or anything. as far as im concerned it is part of the mother untill it is born.
i'm happy he deserves the death penelty. the almost exact same thing happened to my aunt. but her husband beat her to death instead. since they lived in Mass., there is no death penelty. so right now he is sitting in jail. i wasnt for the death penelty until this happened. no one in my family was. you never know how it feels until it happens to you.
Yah i totally agree with you, i don't think they should use the death penalty anyways. Even if it is proven beyond a reasonble doubt that he is guilty. Anyhow i did a study on the death penalty and i found that it actually cost the government more to execute someone that it does to keep them in jail.
Why do people make such a big deal about this? There are murder cases everyday, some worse than this. I know why it's a big deal: Laci Peterson = white Laci Peterson = woman Laci Peterson = had an unborn child that was killed as well No offense, but I could care less.
I'm very glad he was found guilty. I had this feeling that one of the jurors was gonna be an attention-hungry fool and vote not-guilty, just to get some recognition. But, I'm glad he got what he deserved.