I have advice for Bush: "You can fool some of the people all of the time, and all of the people some of the time, but you can not fool all of the people all of the time."
Everyone knows Bush is gonna lose, everyone hates him because of 9/11. Most people don't know about the other stuff but 50,000 deaths isn't the best rep to have.
I don't like his face, i've been saying that from the first time a saw the man's face. Do not like bush. Why can't he be nice?
yeppers. theres no way he's winning the next election. yaaaaaay who will be the president then? [/b][/quote] John Kerry. I don't think he's a much better choice, but anythings better than Bush. John Edwards seemed good, maybe Kerry will use him as VP.
If I were voting, I would be voting for Kerry just because it would be foolish (imo) to vote for Bush. I haven't really heard anything that Kerry is going to do for the nation. All i'm hearing is what Bush has done wrong. Nothing that Kerry plans to do different
If I were American, I'd vote for Kerry... On another note concerning 9/11... Here's another guy with some pretty whacked-out views on the whole 9/11 tragedy. Pretty sickening that he could spread all this around, especially when none of it could possibly be true. He claims to see a "missile pod" on the wing of AA175 (a Boeing 767-223ER, usually just referred to as a 767-200, the ER meaning that it has extended range)...which is a load. I'd love to see the US Govt. put a missile on the wing of a COMMERCIAL AIRLINER that's sitting at Logan Intl in Boston and not have anyone notice it. Not gonna happen. Knowing everything there is to know about the 767, I can fully argue that the only thing that could look close to a missile pod is either the shadow of the #2 engine on the wing fairings (most likely), or a well-timed reflection. He's gone far enough as to make a website about this...it's located here. Any thoughts on this little find I made? Personally, I think he needs to step back and read what he's writing...none of it makes sense anyways.
I read through that site. It's all propaganda. However, even though I don't agree with that guy, what would that small explosion have been?
John Kerry. I don't think he's a much better choice, but anythings better than Bush. John Edwards seemed good, maybe Kerry will use him as VP. [/b][/quote] is kerry a republican? oh yeah, and by the way. whats the difference between a republican and a democrat? do i ask too many questions?
Not necessarly because people will vote him as he caught Saddam... [/b][/quote] yeah. but i dont think he's gonna win. now answer my questions people
Exactly but nobody ever agrees on me about that becouse of that stupid scandle. [/b][/quote] I agree. Clinton had one of the lowest unemployment rates and highest surpluses this country has ever seen. His only mistake was getting a blowjob from an intern and lying about it. Big deal. He didn't kill anyone and he didnt hurt anyone either since apparentley Hillary doesn't seem to mind. Bush lies about all of his reasons for going to war, ignores evidence of a terrorist attack, and thousands of people end up dying and people approve of his actions. Clinton's harmless little lie nearly gets him kicked out of office by the house and senate, but Bush's deadly lies are being supported by the house and senate while he's being considered a hero. It's sickening. Clinton was a good president and knew what he was doing and had this country going in a positive direction. His only mistake was that he was a bit on the horny side. Bush is probably the worst president in the history of the US and has this country headed straight into the toilet, and I don't have time to list all of his mistakes.