Burn it Down's Mixing

Discussion in 'Linkin Park Chat' started by The Emptiness Machine, Apr 22, 2012.

  1. #21
    lime treacle

    lime treacle Über Member Über Member

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2011
    Messages:
    10,927
    Likes Received:
    656



    I bet his username there is Dr. Tentagonapus.
     
  2. #22
    Tweak

    Tweak Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2010
    Messages:
    201
    Likes Received:
    0



    There were a few drum parts that were really low that i feel should have been louder. Just before the last chorus is a good example.
     
  3. #23
    RiderSSPU

    RiderSSPU Leave a Trace LPA Super Member

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2012
    Messages:
    8,422
    Likes Received:
    1,613



    nope his username there is actually Astat
     
  4. #24
    minuteforce

    minuteforce Danny's not here, Mrs. Torrance. LPA Team

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2004
    Messages:
    13,329
    Likes Received:
    2,737



    Yeah, you'd lose that bet. ;P
     
  5. #25
    shwcobb

    shwcobb 持ち上げて 解き放して

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2012
    Messages:
    252
    Likes Received:
    0



    I never noticed guitars on this either, thought Brad is making an ass of himself in the music video. Mixing does suck.
     
  6. #26
    deadbysunrise

    deadbysunrise Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 1, 2010
    Messages:
    203
    Likes Received:
    33



    Yeah, heard Mike's vocals from the very first time I listened to the song, but couldn't clearly recognize what exactly he's singing until a few days ago when I heard a similar mix. They definitely need to be mixed louder, the way he sings it is amazing and being so burned down (yeah) in the mix surely takes away from the song. My other complaint might be the guitar - it could've been mixed louder imo, though it might not sound as good as I imagine it.
     
  7. #27
    Sønic

    Sønic Searching for the last Chaos Emerald... LPA Super Member

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2004
    Messages:
    4,585
    Likes Received:
    706



    Maybe so, but everything else about the album is great so
    I really don't even notice.
     
  8. #28
    Promofrog

    Promofrog Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2012
    Messages:
    246
    Likes Received:
    0



    [video=youtube;THIAGpcYpCQ]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=THIAGpcYpCQ[/video]

    With you on that, they might need to remaster it, on the other hand though perhaps it was intentional, giving the album that old school sound by not tampering with the EQ on anything.

    Yes! I want live drums goddamnit.
     
    Last edited: Apr 22, 2012
  9. #29
    Astat

    Astat LPA Super Member LPA Super Member

    Joined:
    May 3, 2004
    Messages:
    4,130
    Likes Received:
    319



    I love it when threads I'm not even participating in turn into discussions about me. :lol:

    I'd assume the only reason Mike's backing vocals are lower than usual on Burn it Down is because some of them are in unison with Chester (like on "there at the turn," it starts as a harmony but they end up in unison on the word "turn"). You could crank the backing vocals up more to make the harmonies a bit more prominent, but it would cause the unison parts to sound louder than than the vocals do in other parts of the song.
     
  10. #30
    Apop

    Apop LPA VIP LPA VIP

    Joined:
    Aug 19, 2010
    Messages:
    1,281
    Likes Received:
    22



    I think too much focus is being put on Manny and all the other mixers LP has used in the past. Mixing is important, yes, but what's actually important is the product that the six guys in LP produce. The interview article with Manny has put too much focus on this role.
     
  11. #31



    I watched MOATS and have concluded that due to the deadlines, there weren't enough time for post-production D:
     
  12. #32
    Jack_Farrell

    Jack_Farrell KTTK is Chester suicide-diving off a cliff naked

    Joined:
    May 1, 2008
    Messages:
    777
    Likes Received:
    8



    Too much focus? It wouldn't matter if the song was mixed by Manny or Neil or whatever, if it's badly mixed it's badly mixed. There's a shitload of elements in the song that I can't hear and would make it 10 times better.
     
  13. #33
    Apop

    Apop LPA VIP LPA VIP

    Joined:
    Aug 19, 2010
    Messages:
    1,281
    Likes Received:
    22



    I'm not arguing mixing isn't important: it could make a good song bad and a bad song good. However, in the contexts of the entire song and how people will listen to it, a lot of those elements are going to go unnoticed anyway. Mixing's tough. Everyone is going to have different opinions on which elements should be the loudest and which elements should just be background players.
     
  14. #34
    Star Scream

    Star Scream Does A Machine Like You Ever Experience Fear

    Joined:
    Oct 18, 2011
    Messages:
    1,953
    Likes Received:
    5



    i noticed how mike voice is so low in the mix, when i noticed his voice was there, i just pulled my ear phones out a bit from the plug and i heard mikes vocals. i think one of the best things i found about burn it down was how you can discover little sounds that make the song sound epic.
     
  15. #35
    Jack_Farrell

    Jack_Farrell KTTK is Chester suicide-diving off a cliff naked

    Joined:
    May 1, 2008
    Messages:
    777
    Likes Received:
    8



    But it's obvious now that with several examples of YouTube videos the song could've been mixed way better. Not only that, but also could've been done better too, if Mike and Chester sang the verses together in an actual call-and-response way. That would've been innovative for them, and sounded great.
     
  16. #36
    Apop

    Apop LPA VIP LPA VIP

    Joined:
    Aug 19, 2010
    Messages:
    1,281
    Likes Received:
    22



    Maybe my sense of hearing isn't keen enough to notice differences like that or I just can't appreciate sound engineering, but I just can't wrap my head around the utter importance of mixing. I guess I have no choice but to listen to what you have to say about it, you clearly know more than I do on the subject. I just didn't realize mixing could change so much in a song.
     
  17. #37
    Erica

    Erica Meh LPA Über VIP

    Joined:
    Sep 3, 2010
    Messages:
    11,507
    Likes Received:
    1,212



    Lol so much discussion over something I find to have little importance. When its bad, you can really hear it and I think Lp only has a few of those moments
     
  18. #38
    RiderSSPU

    RiderSSPU Leave a Trace LPA Super Member

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2012
    Messages:
    8,422
    Likes Received:
    1,613



    I can hear the guitars just fine and I don't know much about the subject but ill go off of what Astat says for Mike's vocals, which means its better Mike's vocals are like that
     
  19. #39
    Jack_Farrell

    Jack_Farrell KTTK is Chester suicide-diving off a cliff naked

    Joined:
    May 1, 2008
    Messages:
    777
    Likes Received:
    8



    It's just like In Between and Chester's backing vocals. You can hear them clearly when they come up. It's not as easy to hear Mike's harmony in Burn It Down.
     
  20. #40
    Xerø 21

    Xerø 21 I was Ree's 100th follower on Twitter.

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2010
    Messages:
    2,408
    Likes Received:
    185



    A stripped down version of the song sung by Mike with his vocal part would sound a lot better than the original song in my opinion.

    I might actually listen to that version. :lol:
     

Share This Page