Random Thoughts 23!

Fixed

 

Nope. Not at all. Never. Nunca. Nein. Mhai. Atay. Nej. Na. Iie.

 

Yes. Yep. Yeah. Of Course. Always. Si. Oui. Hai. Ja. Ken. Ndiyo. 是. Áno. Nai. Tak. AYE!

 

I make more money than you. Also, I'm more attractive.

 

Beauty is only skin deep

 

I'm smarter than you too.

 

Awww, it's so cute. You are trying to 1-up me on a forum

 

You started it. And I quote,

ergo, all I have been doing is responding to your insinuations of superiority while you have attempted to appear greater is status than I.

 

I said or equal to. Which means that it is possible that I am equal Not, oh I am automatically better.

 

You made comparisons whereas I did not. My comment was a completely obtuse comment claiming that my avatar > everything ever, not being directed towards you or anyone in general.

Not to mention we all know my statement was a joke and false, because there's no way a picture of me could ever be > the actual me.

The fact that you made the comparison means you started the 1-up contest, as I did not make any actual challenges.

 

Yes however, while yours was a joke, that goes the same with my initial post, which makes this argument null.

 

...

 

-_______-

 

Why the long face? nah just kidding

 

You defended your initial argument as if it were a serious post. And I quote,

Whereas while mine was a joke, it was directly implied to be a joke (due to reasons delineated earlier). However it was still a statement of superiority on my part, which is backed up by third parties of whom neither of us hold any sway besides that which our egos and personalities already grasp.

And whereas you consider this argument null, I consider it a valid discussion, which automatically takes higher precedence over any statements you claim valid.

 

Just drop it will you -__-

 

[video=youtube;CCbtvBEPPs8]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CCbtvBEPPs8&feature=player_embedded[/video]

 

The implications that you, hereby referred to as Party A, have superiority over me, hereby referred to as Party B, are made clear in the fact that Party A attempted to generate orders for Party B to follow. Note that Party A uses an inversion of the imperative sentence form, implying the sentence as a command. While Party A claims in posts prior to the post quoted above that his initial post, hereby referred to as the Offending Statement, was a joke and/or farce, he defends it as if it were not a farce as previous delineated. Further, any intellectual discussion or debate directed toward the Offending Statement and the reasoning behind Party A making such a post terminates at the imperative sentence above. Of further interest is the fact that any similar techniques used by Party B for humorous effect were brushed aside from Party A, thus creating the impression of superiority. Of final note, Party B reminds Party A that a third party, known commonly as .in.the.shadows. but will hereby be referred to as Party C, has agreed with conjectures Party B has made and, when pointed out in clear form to Party A, Party A chooses not to accept the support of Party C for Party B and the lack of support for his own statements.

Party B wishes to continue debate with Party A as long as Party A is willing to accept the previously mentioned facts and address them accordingly.

 

I HAVE NO IDEA WHAT THIS MEANS.

But I was name dropped...

 

My avatar is just good

Holy Fuck Minus did you ever consider a future in debating?