Warner Music Pulls Content From YouTube

Discussion in 'Other Music' started by Tim, Dec 21, 2008.

  1. #1
    Tim

    Tim My perversion power is accumulating LPA Super Member

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2007
    Messages:
    7,033
    Likes Received:
    142



    Original story from CNET.

    I'm sure the artists on their roster are thrilled at this news.
     
  2. #2
    2xPutt

    2xPutt Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2003
    Messages:
    1,501
    Likes Received:
    2



    is this also why the playlists were pulled from Myspace as well? I think it was called Project Playlist and I got a message from myspace help saying they pulled it off everyone's myspace because it didn't support the artist... absolute bullshit, so sick of copyright crybabies.
     
  3. #3
    The_Cool_Cow

    The_Cool_Cow Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2005
    Messages:
    616
    Likes Received:
    0



    Well this is a stupid move on Warner's part. I don't know about anyone else, but i've found lots of bands through YouTube. In fact, I got into the Red Hot Chili Peppers through YouTube. I currently own three of their albums, and i'm planning on getting them all. Thats profit for Warner, which they would not see if it had not been for the music on YouTube.
     
  4. #4
    Mr. Benzedrine

    Mr. Benzedrine Rock the 40 Oz

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2004
    Messages:
    2,408
    Likes Received:
    12



    Is Linkin Park not on Warner?
     
  5. #5
    Bryan

    Bryan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2007
    Messages:
    1,073
    Likes Received:
    1



    Unfortunately
     
  6. #6
    Ant

    Ant Ambient

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2004
    Messages:
    2,112
    Likes Received:
    0



    For some reason I really doubt the bands care all that much.

    And the logic for saying you "found" a band through YouTube could just as easily mean that you'll be more likely to pirate their music. Can't really say for sure.

    Not sure how this makes Warner "bad" in any way. They're still working to get a new deal worked out.
     
  7. #7
    Will

    Will LPA Addicted VIP LPA Addicted VIP

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2002
    Messages:
    35,486
    Likes Received:
    38



    A lot of bands use YouTube to post regular video blog updates for their fans. Not having that medium is going to hurt them, in a way. Yes, there are other ways for them to get their news out, but most people would rather watch a video of their favorite band telling them what's up, rather than reading about it, if they can avoid reading about it. People are just lazy that way.
     
  8. #8
    Ant

    Ant Ambient

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2004
    Messages:
    2,112
    Likes Received:
    0



    I wasn't aware it affected blogs, I thought it was only for work contracted by Warner Brothers from the bands. The bands should legally still be allowed to upload blogs, as long as it doesn't contain work contracted by Warner Brothers.

    But if it really does not allow bands to post blogs, that's pretty dumb.
     
  9. #9
    Will

    Will LPA Addicted VIP LPA Addicted VIP

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2002
    Messages:
    35,486
    Likes Received:
    38



    Actually, I hadn't thought of the two (official and promo videos paid for by the labels, and video blogs) being separate things. You're probably right, that the blogs aren't affected by this.
     
  10. #10
    Shadester

    Shadester (╯°□°)╯︵ ┻━┻

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2007
    Messages:
    1,060
    Likes Received:
    7



    I know a lot of people that use YouTube to listen to music when they're away from home or something. Not a great decision, imo.
     
  11. #11
    minuteforce

    minuteforce Danny's not here, Mrs. Torrance. LPA Team

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2004
    Messages:
    13,197
    Likes Received:
    2,584



    Next thing you know, someone might get MySpace to do the same and kill off the audio files on music profiles, and all the stuff on MySpace TV.

    Seriously, what do they expect to gain?
     
  12. #12
    Daniel

    Daniel Run for your life. LPA Super Member

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2006
    Messages:
    7,219
    Likes Received:
    74



    If anything, they're going to lose, what with the lack of exposure and all.
     
  13. #13
    Harlz

    Harlz More Scared Of You Than You Are Of Me LPA Super Member

    Joined:
    May 26, 2006
    Messages:
    6,793
    Likes Received:
    84



    Dickheads, don't they realise Youtube is where people see most of their music videos etc?
     
  14. #14
    Chris.

    Chris. LPA Super Member Über Member

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2003
    Messages:
    12,474
    Likes Received:
    29



    Music Videos are becoming increasingly irrelevant. No more channels really show them too much besides like MTV3 or whatever. Even Fuse is turning into MTV. Now, if labels start removing all their content from youtube, I could very well see it leading to the death of the music video
     
  15. #15
    Jordan

    Jordan Secret Robot

    Joined:
    Apr 17, 2007
    Messages:
    2,657
    Likes Received:
    1



    In Australia they just show music videos. Cept on MTV they show that music related crap.

    But [V], Max and shows like Video Hits and Rage really only show music videos.

    So i guess we've still got a few years to go.
     
  16. #16
    TheRockChick

    TheRockChick Pffft... LPA Super Member

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2007
    Messages:
    4,288
    Likes Received:
    26



    That's just plain horrible. Half the bands' channels I'm subscribed to had their accounts suspended. I'm pissed off.
     
  17. #17
    Nick

    Nick Great Job! LPA Super VIP

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2005
    Messages:
    8,563
    Likes Received:
    12



    I would actually much rather see channel's like MTV and Fuse show LIVE videos of songs, professionally taken videos, like sessions and what not that AOL does and other places. I can't get enough of those.
     
  18. #18
    SecondCityKids

    SecondCityKids Hey John, What's Your Name Again? LPA Super Member

    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2008
    Messages:
    5,517
    Likes Received:
    9



    a very stupid move on Warner Music's part
    its really a lose to them and fans not so much to youtube
    oh well
     
  19. #19
    barnes80

    barnes80 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2007
    Messages:
    501
    Likes Received:
    0




    i honestly never really got the point of music videos anyways... to me its the music that matters, and unless its some really artistic video, i could really care less. Half the videos now are just the same cliche thing done over and over.

    On this whole youtube thing though, i think its retarded that labels want to make money off of, correct me if im wrong, but free advertising... I mean, the labels put music on here, which gets hundreds of thousands of hits and gets their music exposure. And in return for this exposure, youtube makes money off the adds on their site. Seems like a win win situation. If these labels don't want another company making money off their music, they should only make it available on the band site... except, labels know that band sites only reach a certain audience which is why they do use youtube...

    I could be totally wrong about how this whole deal works, but as far as i understand the labels just put their stuff up fro free. Again I could be wrong though.
     
  20. #20
    minusxerø

    minusxerø Overflow Supremacy LPA Addicted VIP

    Joined:
    Aug 24, 2003
    Messages:
    18,951
    Likes Received:
    1,523



    Tsk tsk.

    Anyways, stupid move on Warner's part. Looks like they're not getting a slice of that youtube pie.
     

Share This Page