I seriously dont want to sound like an idiot in my statement. I guess this are two times of music. Guns N Roses from the old status, i guess in theire time sets were bigger than today. Most of band setlists length is something between 90-120 min.
Which is a damn shame. I obviously adore the band, but it shouldn't be too big of a deal for professional musicians to be able to give at least a two hour show on a regular basis.
Yeah, i agree wit that. But otherwise,i dont know how much of an impact the "agressive vocal using" in some of LP songs is for Chester.
I feel LP probably values high-energy, exiting 90 minutes sets over the 2 hour sets they could make, where they would extend the time with slower songs like ATGYA or instrumental breaks. They could easily make it longer and not tiring on them, but people would walk away less impressed most likely. Also, do y'all think LP's festival announcements indicate they're confident the album will be done by out around then, or no?
So I'm curious, whatever happened to that collab from Martin Garrix and Mike? I'm assuming it just hasn't been released yet by Martin's end?
I'm always excited for the new LPU. Maybe we don't get 10 great demos every year, but always there are some (2 or 3) demos that I really like to listen to. Chance Of Rain and Primo are ones of my favourite songs from Linkin Park.
LOL same here tbh. I'm so dead focused on the album news that I forget we'll get something in like 2 weeks! Also totally. Always great to get new demos! I agree. I assume they ain't doing no bi-monthly tracks which is ok with me since the album should be out next year and I don't need to wait 2 months for a 30 second instrumental. I really enjoyed last year's tho. I always thought the LPU since 9 were pretty solid. 13 (besides Primo) and 14 were the only bad ones imo since.
They are still writing the album, so there's a chance that our social climate has influenced some of the music now.