Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 21 to 40 of 42
  1. #21
    Originally posted by DJ_Nate@Dec 15 2003, 10:40 PM
    Well that would mean hed have to get the rights from Sam Raimi, and i dont think hed want to give up the rights if its making him money.
    He doesnt have the rights to the Venom or Carnage. They both have there own coming books. There not just in the spiderman comic series and each studio can purchase what ever super hero or what ever. Its just like Captain America, one studio had the rights another was like hey Marvel we want that movie, they drop some money in to the other studios laps and there we go in 3 years we will have a CA movie.

  2. #22
    I wear a fez now. Fez's are cool. The Doctor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Wilkes-Barre
    Posts
    9,559
    I mean hed need the movie rights, not the characters.



  3. #23
    Movie rights are easy to get when you have alot of money.

  4. #24
    Super Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Springfield, USA
    Posts
    5,780
    Well, since different studios own the rights to Spider-man and Venom, I guess we'll never see them together in the same movie. At least not for a while anyway. They still need a few more years to perfect the cgi for Venom anyway. Universal refuses to do a sequel for The Hulk now because of what happened with the first one. I'd love to see Harry become the second Green Goblin in the third movie like he did in the comics, but people might complain about how the Goblin has been used too many times..but then Magneto has been in two X-men movies and will probably be in the third one too so I dunno.

    and here's the link for the quicktime trailer..that came out today
    http://movies.yahoo.com/movies/feature/spi...derman2qt1.html

  5. #25
    LPA VIP
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Posts
    8,702
    Originally posted by Hybrid_Bunny@Dec 16 2003, 08:36 AM
    and here's the link for the quicktime trailer..that came out today
    http://movies.yahoo.com/movies/feature/spi...derman2qt1.html

    meet the team.



  6. #26
    Originally posted by Hybrid_Bunny+Dec 15 2003, 11:45 PM--></span><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (Hybrid_Bunny @ Dec 15 2003, 11:45 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'>
    Originally posted by -Aaron@Dec 16 2003, 12:45 AM
    Originally posted by -Hybrid_Bunny@Dec 15 2003, 10:09 PM
    Originally posted by -Will@Dec 16 2003, 12:00 AM
    <!--QuoteBegin--DJ_Nate
    @Dec 15 2003, 06:59 PM
    That movies gonna rule, I hope they make a Spiderman movie with Venom and/or Carnage.

    Venom would be amazing.

    Sorry, guys. From what I&#39;ve read online, Sam Raimi says he won&#39;t do any Spider-man movies with Venom and I think he&#39;s contracted to direct the third one too. I think Venom would be awesome too but he might look kinda cartoonish on the big screen

    Considering they&#39;re all cartoon characters already, I don&#39;t think it would matter.


    Anyway, I doubt I&#39;ll see the new Spider-Man.
    I meant cartoonish in the way the Hulk looked. I actually thought he didn&#39;t look all that real, but I guess they did a good enough job. Doc Ock looks convincing enough to me though. Even though he sounded like he lacked his accent in that one line he spoke in the trailer. Oh well [/b][/quote]
    Ohhh, now I get your point. Yeah, I suppose he would look pretty cartoonish, unless they did much better graphics on Venom than they did on the Hulk. Those graphics were ####.


  7. #27
    Super Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Springfield, USA
    Posts
    5,780
    Okay, I checked again and only Tobey Maguire and Kirsten Dunst are signed for all three movies. Sam Raimi isn&#39;t contracted to direct the third movie, but I hope they don&#39;t find a new director and mess it up like they did with the Batman movies.

    Did anyone also notice how Doc Ock has no accent in the trailer?

  8. #28
    or there and back again
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    Slippery Rock, Pennsylvania
    Posts
    34,888
    Originally posted by Mcnasty@Dec 15 2003, 10:47 PM
    Movie rights are easy to get when you have alot of money.
    Not if the director doesn&#39;t want to sell the rights.

  9. #29
    Originally posted by Will+Dec 17 2003, 03:39 PM--></span><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (Will @ Dec 17 2003, 03:39 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin--Mcnasty@Dec 15 2003, 10:47 PM
    Movie rights are easy to get when you have alot of money.
    Not if the director doesn&#39;t want to sell the rights. [/b][/quote]
    why would the director not want to sell the rights if hes never going to make a movie about it ?

  10. #30
    LPA VIP
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Posts
    8,702
    Originally posted by Mcnasty+Dec 17 2003, 08:43 PM--></span><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (Mcnasty @ Dec 17 2003, 08:43 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'>
    Originally posted by -Will@Dec 17 2003, 03:39 PM
    <!--QuoteBegin--Mcnasty
    @Dec 15 2003, 10:47 PM
    Movie rights are easy to get when you have alot of money.

    Not if the director doesn&#39;t want to sell the rights.
    why would the director not want to sell the rights if hes never going to make a movie about it ? [/b][/quote]
    micheal jackson owns the rights to all of the beatles recordings even though he hasnt covered one in almost 20 years. its the idea of having something someone else wants and refusing to give it to them.

  11. #31
    but thatd different hes rish I bet you a Director wouldnt have that much money and would want more and sell the rights.

  12. #32
    I wear a fez now. Fez's are cool. The Doctor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Wilkes-Barre
    Posts
    9,559
    Originally posted by Mcnasty@Dec 18 2003, 01:13 AM
    but thatd different hes rish I bet you a Director wouldnt have that much money and would want more and sell the rights.
    Sam Raimi has been making stuff for years, he does have a lot of money, but why sell something that is making him even more money? Common sense.

  13. #33
    or there and back again
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    Slippery Rock, Pennsylvania
    Posts
    34,888
    Originally posted by DJ_Nate+Dec 18 2003, 06:37 AM--></span><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (DJ_Nate @ Dec 18 2003, 06:37 AM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin--Mcnasty@Dec 18 2003, 01:13 AM
    but thatd different hes rish I bet you a Director wouldnt have that much money and would want more and sell the rights.
    Sam Raimi has been making stuff for years, he does have a lot of money, but why sell something that is making him even more money? Common sense. [/b][/quote]
    Exactly.

    Once he gives up the rights to Spider-Man, he can never make any money off of the first two movies ever again. All the profits would go to the guy who would own the rights to Spider-Man after Raimi.

  14. #34
    OH MY F****** GOD&#33;&#33;&#33;&#33;&#33;&#33;&#33;&#33;&#33;&# 33;&#33;&#33;&#33;&#33;&#33;


    Spider-man is the best movie ever for me... this is gonna rock my world....


    OMG I CAN&#39;T WAIT&#33;&#33;&#33;&#33;&#33;&#33;&#33;&#33;&#33;& #33;&#33;&#33;&#33;&#33;&#33;&#33;&#33;&#33;&#33;& #33;

  15. #35
    Angry Marines. Always angry, all the time. >:C User Name's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Posts
    7,078
    The movie looks pretty good from the Trailer. I can&#39;t wait to see it.
    So, I'm going to go kick Abaddon in the balls. Later.

  16. #36
    Originally posted by Will+Dec 18 2003, 11:58 AM--></span><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (Will @ Dec 18 2003, 11:58 AM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'>
    Originally posted by -DJ_Nate@Dec 18 2003, 06:37 AM
    <!--QuoteBegin--Mcnasty
    @Dec 18 2003, 01:13 AM
    but thatd different hes rish I bet you a Director wouldnt have that much money and would want more and sell the rights.

    Sam Raimi has been making stuff for years, he does have a lot of money, but why sell something that is making him even more money? Common sense.
    Exactly.

    Once he gives up the rights to Spider-Man, he can never make any money off of the first two movies ever again. All the profits would go to the guy who would own the rights to Spider-Man after Raimi. [/b][/quote]
    Iam not talking about the rights to spider-man i was talking about venom and carnage. The Director doesnt have the rights to the whole spider-man universe only spiderman and some characters he has to get the rights for you know. He would never give up the rights to spiderman.

  17. #37
    I wear a fez now. Fez's are cool. The Doctor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Wilkes-Barre
    Posts
    9,559
    Originally posted by Mcnasty+Dec 19 2003, 12:55 AM--></span><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (Mcnasty @ Dec 19 2003, 12:55 AM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'>
    Originally posted by -Will@Dec 18 2003, 11:58 AM
    Originally posted by -DJ_Nate@Dec 18 2003, 06:37 AM
    <!--QuoteBegin--Mcnasty
    @Dec 18 2003, 01:13 AM
    but thatd different hes rish I bet you a Director wouldnt have that much money and would want more and sell the rights.

    Sam Raimi has been making stuff for years, he does have a lot of money, but why sell something that is making him even more money? Common sense.

    Exactly.

    Once he gives up the rights to Spider-Man, he can never make any money off of the first two movies ever again. All the profits would go to the guy who would own the rights to Spider-Man after Raimi.
    Iam not talking about the rights to spider-man i was talking about venom and carnage. The Director doesnt have the rights to the whole spider-man universe only spiderman and some characters he has to get the rights for you know. He would never give up the rights to spiderman. [/b][/quote]
    You still dont get it. That other guys cant make a Spiderman movie UNLESS Raimi sells the rights. And hes not.

  18. #38
    Banned
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Posts
    1,297
    Originally posted by Ppr:Kut@Dec 18 2003, 06:05 PM
    OH MY F****** GOD&#33;&#33;&#33;&#33;&#33;&#33;&#33;&#33;&#33;&# 33;&#33;&#33;&#33;&#33;&#33;


    Spider-man is the best movie ever for me... this is gonna rock my world....


    OMG I CAN&#39;T WAIT&#33;&#33;&#33;&#33;&#33;&#33;&#33;&#33;&#33;& #33;&#33;&#33;&#33;&#33;&#33;&#33;&#33;&#33;&#33;& #33;
    yes the first was good, but wayyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy overrated, i give it a 7/10, i dont think it should have been the biggest movie ever, i really dont see how, there are so many other better movies, but whatever. still looking forward to spidy 2

  19. #39
    or there and back again
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    Slippery Rock, Pennsylvania
    Posts
    34,888
    Originally posted by Mcnasty+Dec 19 2003, 12:55 AM--></span><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (Mcnasty @ Dec 19 2003, 12:55 AM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'>
    Originally posted by -Will@Dec 18 2003, 11:58 AM
    Originally posted by -DJ_Nate@Dec 18 2003, 06:37 AM
    <!--QuoteBegin--Mcnasty
    @Dec 18 2003, 01:13 AM
    but thatd different hes rish I bet you a Director wouldnt have that much money and would want more and sell the rights.

    Sam Raimi has been making stuff for years, he does have a lot of money, but why sell something that is making him even more money? Common sense.

    Exactly.

    Once he gives up the rights to Spider-Man, he can never make any money off of the first two movies ever again. All the profits would go to the guy who would own the rights to Spider-Man after Raimi.
    Iam not talking about the rights to spider-man i was talking about venom and carnage. The Director doesnt have the rights to the whole spider-man universe only spiderman and some characters he has to get the rights for you know. He would never give up the rights to spiderman. [/b][/quote]
    What good would having the rights to Venom or Carnage be if you can&#39;t put the main character (Spider-Man) in the movie?

  20. #40
    Originally posted by Will+Dec 20 2003, 11:42 AM--></span><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (Will @ Dec 20 2003, 11:42 AM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'>
    Originally posted by -Mcnasty@Dec 19 2003, 12:55 AM
    Originally posted by -Will@Dec 18 2003, 11:58 AM
    Originally posted by -DJ_Nate@Dec 18 2003, 06:37 AM
    <!--QuoteBegin--Mcnasty
    @Dec 18 2003, 01:13 AM
    but thatd different hes rish I bet you a Director wouldnt have that much money and would want more and sell the rights.

    Sam Raimi has been making stuff for years, he does have a lot of money, but why sell something that is making him even more money? Common sense.

    Exactly.

    Once he gives up the rights to Spider-Man, he can never make any money off of the first two movies ever again. All the profits would go to the guy who would own the rights to Spider-Man after Raimi.

    Iam not talking about the rights to spider-man i was talking about venom and carnage. The Director doesnt have the rights to the whole spider-man universe only spiderman and some characters he has to get the rights for you know. He would never give up the rights to spiderman.
    What good would having the rights to Venom or Carnage be if you can&#39;t put the main character (Spider-Man) in the movie? [/b][/quote]
    SPIDER-MAN ISNT GOING TO BE IN THE MOVIE its about Venom thats why its called a Venom movie with Carnage in it the Movie will have nothing to do with spiderman at all not even mention him.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •