I was thinking about buying headphones.
And I'm thinking between this: http://www.ebay.com/itm/Vibe-Sound-V...ht_4019wt_1139
and this: http://www.ebay.com/itm/Sennheiser-H...ht_4183wt_1139
And Beats Solo HD Mini.
I prefer the Solo HD Mini.
I was thinking about buying headphones.
And I'm thinking between this: http://www.ebay.com/itm/Vibe-Sound-V...ht_4019wt_1139
and this: http://www.ebay.com/itm/Sennheiser-H...ht_4183wt_1139
And Beats Solo HD Mini.
I prefer the Solo HD Mini.
Last edited by wakadoodle; 06-11-2012 at 12:31 PM.
I prefer Sennheiser.
Originally Posted by Anelle Botha
I have the Beats Solo HD, I enjoy them. I know a lot of people hate on them, I don't quite understand why.
My friend also has them, they are really great on the neck too.
I guess I'm buying Beats Solo.
Here's why beats solo suck:
- overpriced
- brittle
- on ear/not over ear
- sound quality is only 20-20 hz...just bass boosted
If you don't mind spending a little more, these are one of the best out there. http://www.amazon.com/Sony-MDR-V6-Mo...ony+headphones
These are the older version of the newer Sony MDR7509HD Professional Headphones, which a ton of pros use, but the sound is basically the same for $79 instead of $219. Both are studio monitor headphones. I own the MDR-V6's and they are crystal clear and very comfortable. I've worn them over 8 hours straight and I was still comfortable.
Frequency response is 5Hz-30kHz and 5Hz-80kHz between the two. Looks like a big difference, but the human ear can only pick up about 5Hz-23kHz anyways.
But yeah, the first MDR-V6's were made around 1990, and some musicians are still using those. They claim the sound gets better with time, and they are still comfortable 20 years later. Buying a brand new pair today can't really be a bad investment imo.
Last edited by travz21; 06-11-2012 at 03:31 PM.
I have used a pair of the sony's. They're good and have decent clarity but lack the response and soundstage of better headphones. I still recommend something like the Sennheiser HD555 or Audio Technica ATH-M50. It's impossible to beat those two headphones in anything unless you want to pay over $400.
Just to say, from these prices, all of these headphones have already left the context.
They actually have better response than both of those you listed. As for soundstage, most really good headphones will be similar. If you really care about soundstage, you should be using speakers anyways.
I am actually in the middle of finding good headphones too, I found these that I might purchase, it is in the under 60 dollar price range:
http://www.amazon.com/HARMAN-K81DJ-C...ywords=akg+k81 I heard these actually have great isolation.
http://www.amazon.com/Monoprice-Prem...ords=monoprice Good deal for the money, I heard from audiophiles.
http://www.amazon.com/Sennheiser-HD-...nnheiser+hd419 Sennheiser quality, also runs great on an iPod.
Beats.......![]()
This aint no sham.
I am what I am.
I'll leave no tide for a cynic's mind.
Senhiesers, beat pair of headphones I've ever owned. I have skullcandies right now though, just cause i don't have the means for the senhiesers I want. Their ok. Good for style but very underwhelming in the performance dept. HD 280s dude. Do it.
We're all a little weird and life is a little weird, and when we find someone who's weirdness is compatible with ours we fall in mutual weirdness and call it love.
No they don't. There's a reason that Beats don't list their sound spectrum on their packaging. Upon professional testing, they are only 20-20. And as for soundstage you are so off on beats vs others. Beats is all about in your face bass blasting. There is not soundstage based on that sound. Quality audiophile headphones from sennheiser and audio technica provide very accurate representations of a soundstage.
When did I say anything about Beats?![]()
Yea stay awayyyyy from Beats n Skullpussy. o_0
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)