View Full Version : forgotten lyrics on this site
321xero
03-13-2003, 02:27 AM
"skies c*ck back"
why is this part censored?
"skies cocked back"
cocked, meaning = To tilt or turn up or to one side
so the skies are tilted!
am i wrong?
prove me wrong.
sup103
03-13-2003, 02:32 AM
WTF? Who cares? :unsure:
The word censor would have picked it up and made it #### so we had to make it "c*ck"
hehe
- Alex
321xero
03-13-2003, 02:49 AM
but isn't it "cocked" because mike says "skies" which is plural, so it should be "cocked" which it looks like i can say! cocked! :lol:
sup103, what's your deal? if you don't care, don't respond to the thread, kid.
Willstar
03-13-2003, 12:01 PM
Originally posted by 321xero@Mar 12 2003, 09:49 PM
but isn't it "cocked" because mike says "skies" which is plural, so it should be "cocked" which it looks like i can say! cocked! :lol:
sup103, what's your deal? if you don't care, don't respond to the thread, kid.
Speaking on the word, you're a little cocky yourself.
And, no, it is not plural. It is "cock," not "cocked."
Ooh, look at how I break through the word censor. :chemist:
We have a word censor? :huh:
Willstar
03-13-2003, 01:00 PM
Originally posted by lp_hybridtheory_xero@Mar 13 2003, 08:00 AM
We have a word censor? :huh:
Yeah, it censors most of the "bad" words.
Bryan
03-13-2003, 01:16 PM
Originally posted by lp_hybridtheory_xero@Mar 13 2003, 09:00 AM
We have a word censor? :huh:
See watch: #######
See how it censors it? :P
#### #### #### ######
-oh yeah, cool lol
DragonBlade
03-16-2003, 07:13 AM
well, thats ####### ####!
:lol:
321xero
03-16-2003, 06:56 PM
Originally posted by Akuma+Mar 13 2003, 04:01 AM--></span><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (Akuma @ Mar 13 2003, 04:01 AM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin--321xero@Mar 12 2003, 09:49 PM
but isn't it "cocked" because mike says "skies" which is plural, so it should be "cocked" which it looks like i can say! cocked! :lol:
sup103, what's your deal? if you don't care, don't respond to the thread, kid.
Speaking on the word, you're a little cocky yourself.
And, no, it is not plural. It is "cock," not "cocked."
Ooh, look at how I break through the word censor. :chemist: [/b][/quote]
no, i still think it's "cocked back" because even if it were "sky's" as in "the sky is" it wouldn't make sense to say "the sky is c.ock back" right? it would make more sense to say "the sky is cocked back." but if we said it was "skies", like i said it might be, then it would be "the skies are cocked back" and "c.ock" wouldn't work there. see what i'm saying?
Willstar
03-16-2003, 06:58 PM
Originally posted by 321xero+Mar 16 2003, 01:56 PM--></span><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (321xero @ Mar 16 2003, 01:56 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> Originally posted by -Akuma@Mar 13 2003, 04:01 AM
<!--QuoteBegin--321xero@Mar 12 2003, 09:49 PM
but isn't it "cocked" because mike says "skies" which is plural, so it should be "cocked" which it looks like i can say! cocked! :lol:
sup103, what's your deal? if you don't care, don't respond to the thread, kid.
Speaking on the word, you're a little cocky yourself.
And, no, it is not plural. It is "cock," not "cocked."
Ooh, look at how I break through the word censor. :chemist:
no, i still think it's "cocked back" because even if it were "sky's" as in "the sky is" it wouldn't make sense to say "the sky is c.ock back" right? it would make more sense to say "the sky is cocked back." but if we said it was "skies", like i said it might be, then it would be "the skies are cocked back" and "c.ock" wouldn't work there. see what i'm saying? [/b][/quote]
It's present tense..
[the] Skies cock back and shock that which can't defend...
Get it? ;)
321xero
03-16-2003, 07:02 PM
ohh, okay i get it now. thanks a lot!!!
Willstar
03-16-2003, 07:03 PM
Originally posted by 321xero@Mar 16 2003, 02:02 PM
ohh, okay i get it now. thanks a lot!!!
Yay! I explained something right! Now I feel smurt. :D
Bryan
03-16-2003, 07:11 PM
Originally posted by Akuma+Mar 16 2003, 03:03 PM--></span><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (Akuma @ Mar 16 2003, 03:03 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin--321xero@Mar 16 2003, 02:02 PM
ohh, okay i get it now. thanks a lot!!!
Yay! I explained something right! Now I feel smurt. :D [/b][/quote]
Not for long.
You spelled smart wrong. :lol:
:P
Willstar
03-16-2003, 07:15 PM
Originally posted by Chester 76+Mar 16 2003, 02:11 PM--></span><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (Chester 76 @ Mar 16 2003, 02:11 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> Originally posted by -Akuma@Mar 16 2003, 03:03 PM
<!--QuoteBegin--321xero@Mar 16 2003, 02:02 PM
ohh, okay i get it now. thanks a lot!!!
Yay! I explained something right! Now I feel smurt. :D
Not for long.
You spelled smart wrong. :lol:
:P [/b][/quote]
I did that on purpose.
ThElOsTpRoPhEt
03-27-2003, 02:46 PM
uhm......a weird thread ;)
vBulletin® v3.7.4, Copyright ©2000-2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.