Should live performances be exact copies of studio material?

Discussion in 'Other Music' started by RapidGunner, Apr 21, 2012.

  1. RapidGunner

    RapidGunner The Catalyst

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2012
    Messages:
    216
    Likes Received:
    0
    Being a musician myself, this is an interesting question I've always wondered about -

    Should bands/solo-artists try to replicate their recorded work note-by-note? Or should they loosen up and make it simpler/different so that it suits better to a live setting?

    On one side, you have guys like Arcade Fire, RATM and Linkin Park, who try their best to play the song exactly like the studio version. Even the "wierd"/unusual instruments used in the studio are brought out to the live setting to try and replicate that sound.

    But then you have bands like Nine Inch Nails, Muse and Radiohead, who change up the sound so that it can be played easier live (without worrying about recreating the "exact" electronic bleeps and all that) and can be enjoyed more by the fans and the band themselves. Also, it makes the live experience more interesting because everyone gets to hear a "different" version.

    What kind of performance do you guys prefer?
     
    Last edited: Apr 21, 2012
  2. Minus

    Minus I am not Mike Shinoda. LPA Addicted VIP

    Joined:
    Aug 24, 2003
    Messages:
    18,121
    Likes Received:
    44
    I don't know about that. Linkin Park has definitely been a band to change up songs. From incorporating new intros and outros to mashing up songs (FM verses over POA, for instance. Or Hands Held High over the reanimated version of Crawling, to combine both examples thus far), they've definitely tried to make each song unique.

    They completely redid the piano part to My December. They created a piano intro for Breaking The Habit. They completely redid Wake during the MTM touring cycle. The Radiance is completely different live. Hell, the Mario Savio speech from W&K now belongs to The Radiance.

    In The End typically has bits of the Pushing Me Away guitar part played during the second verse.

    Linkin Park definitely loosen up and change songs up during their live shows.
     
  3. RapidGunner

    RapidGunner The Catalyst

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2012
    Messages:
    216
    Likes Received:
    0
    Okay, I somewhat agree. I was hesitant about adding Linkin Park in that group too. But no other band name's coming to my mind right now (although there are many such bands who sound EXACTLY like their own studio stuff). But i guess you get the idea of the question anyways.

    EDIT :- added some band names in the original post.. ;)
     
    Last edited: Apr 21, 2012
  4. minuteforce

    minuteforce Danny's not here, Mrs. Torrance. LPA Team

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2004
    Messages:
    10,849
    Likes Received:
    93
    I personally subscribe to "loosening up" in a live environment. The songs that I write, whether it's on my own or in a collaborative environment, generally come down to a vocal melody over progressions and a specific dynamic structure. The only instrument I can play is keyboard and some piano so I write pretty much exclusively using those instruments (my drum programming ideas generally don't develop into fully-fledged songs). Since everything I write can effectively be played using a single instrument plus vocals, it doesn't matter however much production I add later or how much I add or subtract from that because the core of the song is always intact. Obviously, that doesn't work for everyone but that's just my background and how it informs how I look at the matter. :)

    You should determine what the most important aspects of the song are in terms of playing it and you find something to fulfil each of those things. A song isn't just a studio recording; it can evolve beyond that. :) Nine Inch Nails, during the promotion of "Pretty Hate Machine", were known for making their songs considerably heavier on-stage than they were on the album, presumably just because they were more fun to play that way and made for a better show or listening experience. Linkin Park do a lot of things in studio versions that don't quite make it into live versions to the point where live versions become distinct in their own right. A good example is, as Minus mentioned, "The Radiance".
     
  5. RapidGunner

    RapidGunner The Catalyst

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2012
    Messages:
    216
    Likes Received:
    0
    Nice point. And yeah, my songwriting process is pretty similar to yours. :)
     
  6. iamsatan

    iamsatan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2010
    Messages:
    782
    Likes Received:
    0
    I like it when bands/artists change it up, it makes the live show more exciting and surprising for fans.
     
  7. soun'wave

    soun'wave can't shake the shock

    Joined:
    Aug 30, 2011
    Messages:
    59
    Likes Received:
    0
    i love the way Radiohead change up tracks like The Gloaming and Idioteque, the same with Linkin Parks radiance, its unexpected, and alot more interesting
     
  8. Robert

    Robert Not Filip Über Member

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2011
    Messages:
    10,788
    Likes Received:
    14
    My answer is no. Live performances sometimes sound better, per say, if something's added - like Brad's guitars in the verses of Given Up to Rob's drumming in Iridescent. Artists, expecially bands should be free in live shows. When it came to playing a guitar solo, Kurt Cobain didn't play it like it was in the studio version, but how he wanted to, how he felt like playing it.
     
  9. Erica

    Erica Grab your hammer and heels LPA Über VIP

    Joined:
    Sep 3, 2010
    Messages:
    11,490
    Likes Received:
    0
    If I'm going to go spend money on a show I want to see or hear something I haven't heard before. Make it a unique experience not just rolling through the hits
     
  10. deftonesfan867

    deftonesfan867 976-EVIL

    Joined:
    Apr 5, 2010
    Messages:
    1,250
    Likes Received:
    4
    No.

    One of the best things about attending a live show is the change up bands make.

    Those who don't are lazy and could care less about their music IMO.
     
  11. They should just have Mr. Hahn DJ all their songs, and the rest of the band could be backup dancers :awesome:
     
  12. RapidGunner

    RapidGunner The Catalyst

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2012
    Messages:
    216
    Likes Received:
    0
    And I'd still pay money to watch that! :D

    And yeah, I guess the general consensus here is that people want to see something "different" in live shows. But, outside this community, there are many guys who HATE it when bands change it up.. One of my friends (to whom I asked this) said - "I pay money to listen to the song I like, not its crappy, watered down version." Btw, he HATES the live versions of Nine Inch Nails songs! Another example; some Youtube comments on Nirvana's live videos claim that Kurt changed up the solos because he couldn't play them! Wtf? :p

    Do they have a point, or are they a**holes? :D
     
  13. $pvcxGhxztCasey

    $pvcxGhxztCasey cut the birth cords + press send LPA Addicted VIP

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2003
    Messages:
    15,858
    Likes Received:
    1
    Sometimes, it's impressive when the live shows sounds exactly like the albums. For instance, the Weeknd. But, I don't want to hear, say, the Red Hot Chili Peppers do a 2 1/2 hour set or something and have it sound exactly like a CD being played really loud in an arena full of people.

    It just depends, really. If I'm at a hip-hop show, I rather it sound like the album, but only because most rappers live are garbage and really kills my interest in them as an artist (wassup Lil' Wayne?).
     
  14. RapidGunner

    RapidGunner The Catalyst

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2012
    Messages:
    216
    Likes Received:
    0
    Good point. :)
     
  15. ernieball003

    ernieball003 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2006
    Messages:
    1,251
    Likes Received:
    0
    Do the song justice, not the recording.
     
  16. Jesse

    Jesse Out of the abyss. LPA Über VIP

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2007
    Messages:
    11,055
    Likes Received:
    10
    I like when bands change it up.
     
  17. It depends on the songs and artist. I mean, Pendulum added more guitar to some of their songs and mixed up the synths a bit. Along with putting Voodoo People in Blood Sugar at Download Festival.
     
  18. Apop

    Apop Swedish Fish Mafia LPA VIP

    Joined:
    Aug 19, 2010
    Messages:
    1,279
    Likes Received:
    0
    Putting variation on songs always makes it interesting for the more serious fan, for the casual fan, it could have mixed consequences. I went to the MSG concert last year with some friends who are more casual listeners of Linkin Park than I am. With the No More Sorrow intro that LP plays live, two of my friends absolutely loved it, while my one friend wished they just played the song as it appears on the album.
     
  19. minuteforce

    minuteforce Danny's not here, Mrs. Torrance. LPA Team

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2004
    Messages:
    10,849
    Likes Received:
    93
    Personally, I think that Nine Inch Nails' songs were substantially more aggressive-sounding in their live sets, so it's kind of the opposite of "watered down", IMO ;D
     

Share This Page